|
Augmet brings the highest quality climate
augmentation services possible, with new leadership, technology
and innovations.
»
Weather modification for rainfall
Even small percentage increase in rainfall
has a large impact on rainfall gain to irrigation and
catchments. This fact makes weather modification the cheapest
water available from any method because only a small increase in
rainfall equals or betters any other form of obtaining water.
Larger gains reduce relative cost as more water is obtained.
Even though a percentage increase in
rainfall may seem poor value for money, 1mm of rain over 1km˛
equates to 1 Megalitre (1,000,000 litres of water). Catchments
with heavier rain have more runoff, so small increases in
rainfall actually have marked effects on dam levels. More water
on the ground takes longer to evaporate, benefiting agriculture
and crops.
Annual rainfall after 20% cloud seeding
increase.

Note:
Performance variation should be expected due to the changing
nature of the climate. Differences in latitude and local
climatology: BAT tactics and technologies ensure higher than
past, traditional outcomes. Average gains in rainfall around 20%
have occurred after cloud seeding in the past and are used here
as a guide only, to give a general illustration of water gains
and costs. Larger, smaller and no gains have also been
experienced, variability of suitable clouds and other factors
vital for weather modification changes and varies results
obtained.
»
Irrigation

Increased water for
crops allows water to penetrate deeper into the soil and roots
because the water is on the ground for longer, and more water
soaks deeper into the ground. Additional rainwater provided by
weather modification takes longer to
evaporate, (ground, crops and
grass stay moist longer). Increased energy and time is required
to deplete it compared to lower rainfall, allowing plant roots
to draw more water into the roots and leaves. Increased humidity
at ground level also increases growth, and it takes longer for
an area to dry out.
Irrigation costs in Australia alone, per
year exceed $12 billion. Many farmers are under pressure from
the Government to give up traditional sources of water such as
bores or rivers for environmental reasons.
»
Pre and post weather
modification: boosting local humidity (exaggerated graph)

»
Catchments
Local evaporation and ground absorption
rates dictate how much rainfall water becomes catchment.
Typically 80% to 90% of total rainfall water is lost before
reaching a dam in arid conditions. As rainfall improves losses
to evaporation and ground absorption are lower, giving more run
off (and water), exponentially increasing returns, which is why
floods can occur quite quickly, regardless of how dry it has
been.
Improved rainfall reduces ground absorption loss from catchment
areas

Catchments and irrigation facilities are generally engineered to
utilise
an areas known annual rainfall: usually to an areas driest known
conditions. Weather modification boosts rain back closer to
average standard which dams and catchments were engineered for,
during sustained arid conditions and periods of below average
rainfall. This provides relief until fluctuating conditions
normalise,
with minimal expenditure.
Increase in water flowing to catchment

»
Improvements and costs of cloud seeding example: local
rainfall of 400 mm of rain per year
Total rainfall of 400mm per year/5000km˛
area: BAT
weather modification at $2 million.
20% increase in rain will yield 80mm of
additional rain.
Irrigation 20% gain: 400,000 Megalitres @$5 a Megalitre.
»
Catchment increases from
weather modification (costs and yields)
With 10% of 400mm annual rainfall proceeding
to a city or town dam, water improvements and cost are:
20% increase in rainfall: 40,000 Megalitres
@$50 per Megalitre or 4 cents per kilolitre
* Catchments can receive 20% of total
rainfall, for these double yields and halve costs*
»
Water totals per 1000km˛ area (excludes
increased weir contributions etc).
|
Irrigation
20% gain
|
40000
|
80,000
|
120,000
|
160,000
|
200,000
|
|
|
MEGALITRES per
1000km˛ areas
|
|
Catchment
Rate
gain
20% (20%)
10% (20%)
|
8000
4000
|
16,000
8000
|
24,000
12,000
|
32,000
16,000
|
40,000
20,000
|
|
Annual rain
|
200mm
|
400mm
|
600mm
|
800mm
|
1000mm
|
BAT weather modification costs:
•
$2 million for
5000km˛ (x 5 for water, divide by $2 million for
Megalitre cost).
• $3 million for 20,000km˛ (x 20
for water, divide for Megalitre cost).
• $5 million for 50,000km˛ (x 50
for water, divide for Megalitre cost).
»
Weather Modification demo: water yield + costs: Sydney City
Catchment, Australia
Sources: Cloud seeding study
estimates between 20% and 37% rainfall increase: Gosford
City Councils Technology Action Group, NSW.
NOTE: 20% rainfall gain statistics shown here only
Rainfall figures
Bureau of Meteorology, Australia
Reported 2007 February Rainfall: Daily
Telegraph, Sydney Australia:
Warragamba catchment 40mm rain /80000
megalitres return or 2000 megalitres per mm
Sydney weekly water consumption = 10,000 Megalitres per week
BAT weather modification costs: Sydney
Catchment Area = $3,000,000
20%
increase in decile 1 rainfall (decile 1 is the average
minimum rain ever experienced)
145mm extra rainfall (Lithgow) = 290,000
megalitres = $10.34 per Megalitre= 29 weeks supply
112mm extra rainfall (Mittagong) =
224,000 megalitres = $13.39 per Megalitre = 22 weeks
supply
Total average annual yield/cost= 257,000 Megalitres (25.7
weeks supply) @ $11.67 per Megalitre
|